February 2007 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Feb 1 05:10:49 PST 2007
Ending: Wed Feb 28 16:11:48 PST 2007
Messages: 322

• [EM] "Banzhaf Myth"   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] "designing to the benchmark", strategy hurts   Brian Olson
• [EM] "designing to the benchmark", strategy hurts   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] "Election Methods" vs. "Voting System" ?   Chris Backert
• [EM] "More Condorcet myths"   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] "Weighted Webster", Apportionment, Moral rightness etc   Warren Smith
• [EM] "Weighted Webster", Apportionment, Moral rightness etc   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 2008 presidential predictions   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 2nd Abd reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 2nd Lomax reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] [RangeVoting] A Voter's Eye View   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [RangeVoting] A Voter's Eye View   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] [RangeVoting] A Voter's Eye View   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Abd: Condorcet vs RV   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Abd reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A delusion (reply to Ossipoff) about Condorcet methods   Warren Smith
• [EM] Advantages of the various proposals   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Chris Benham
• [EM] A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A more efficient strategy-free ratings-based method than Hay voting   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] A more efficient strategy-free ratings-based method than Hay voting   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] A more efficient strategy-free ratings-based method than Hay voting   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] A more efficient strategy-free ratings-based method than Hay voting   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] A more efficient strategy-free ratings-based method than Hay voting   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] apportionment, morality & goals   Warren Smith
• [EM] A really simple, stupid usability point for 0..99   Brian Olson
• [EM] Are apportionment academics as incompetent as voting system academics?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Asset Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Asset Voting   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Asset Voting   James Gilmour
• [EM] Asset Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Asset Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A Voter's Eye View   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Ballot omission corrected--Kucinich   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] banzhaf myth   Warren Smith
• [EM] Borda and Honest Voters   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Borda and Honest Voters   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] Borda reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Brief Approval vs RV clarification   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Brief Approval vs RV clarification   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris's letter revisited   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris's letter revisited   Chris Benham
• [EM] Chris's letter revisited   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Chris BC reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris BC reply   Chris Benham
• [EM] Chris BC reply   Juho
• [EM] Chris BC reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris BC reply   Juho
• [EM] Chris BC reply   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Chris BC reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Chris BC reply   Juho
• [EM] Chris reply, Feb. 18, 0117 GMT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris SFC reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] city block distance, Condorcet winners, and social-utility maximizers   Warren Smith
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Warren Smith
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Warren Smith
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Juho
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Warren Smith
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Warren Smith
• [EM] Comments on Heitzig's utility essay   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Complete sincere Nash equilibria test posting   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Complete sincere Nash equilibria test posting   Juho
• [EM] Condorcet and Participation, Moulin's proof   Chris Benham
• [EM] Condorcet and Participation, Moulin's proof   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Condorcet and Participation, Moulin's proof   Chris Benham
• [EM] Condorcet vs RV   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Condorcet vs RV   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Condorcet vs RV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Conversations with Jo-Ann Q. Public   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Michael Poole
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Brian Olson
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Ka-Ping Yee
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Brian Olson
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Ka-Ping Yee
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Brian Olson
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Brian Olson
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] criticisms of range voting   Warren Smith
• [EM] CW & SU   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] CW & SU (response to Ossipoff false claims)   Warren Smith
• [EM] cycle of defeats (sort of) in Zogby poll results   Jan Kok
• [EM] Dave reply, Feb. 19, 0831 GMT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Dave reply, Feb. 19, 0831 GMT   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Dave reply. ARLO and power-truncation.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Dave reply. ARLO and power-truncation.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Easy voting & handcount. Approval vs RV.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Easy voting & handcount. Approval vs RV.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] EM polls don't need ARLO or power truncation   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] EM presidential poll ballot   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Fermat-Weber point   Warren Smith
• [EM] five monotonic methods ...   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] five monotonic methods that choose from the uncovered set   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] five monotonic ways to select winners from the uncovered set   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] five monotonic ways to select winners from the uncovered set   Markus Schulze
• [EM] forms of "equality" and "efficiency"   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] FW: The value of K, for the original method   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Getting carried away and claiming RV is as good as Condorcet...   Warren Smith
• [EM] Getting carried away and claiming RV is as good as Condorcet...   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Getting carried away and claiming RV is as good as Condorcet...   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Getting carried away and claiming RV is as good as Condorcet...   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Hay Voting   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Hay Voting   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Hay Voting   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Warren Smith
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Hay Voting busted   Warren Smith
• [EM] Hay Voting busted   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay Voting busted   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Hay Voting busted   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Hay Voting busted   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay Voting can emulate Approval Voting   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Hay voting simulated in IEVS   Warren Smith
• [EM] Hay voting simulated in IEVS   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] IEVS 2.56 update on findings, status, deficiencies   Warren Smith
• [EM] IEVS: range not longer always top of heap?   Warren Smith
• [EM] International invitation   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] I propose an EM poll   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] I want to apologize for the cordialilty-lapse.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho's example   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho's example   Juho
• [EM] Juho, unexplanable strategy attitudes   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho, unexplanable strategy attitudes   Juho
• [EM] Juho--about unreversed Nash equilibria   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho--about unreversed Nash equilibria   Juho
• [EM] Juho--about unreversed Nash equilibria   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho--about unreversed Nash equilibria   Juho
• [EM] Juho: Your other examples   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho: Your other examples   Juho
• [EM] Juho reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho reply   Juho
• [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT   Juho
• [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT   Juho
• [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT   James Gilmour
• [EM] Juho reply, 21 Feb., 1053 GMT   Juho
• [EM] Juho reply, 22 Feb., 1548 GMT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho reply, 22 Feb., 1548 GMT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho reply, 22 Feb., 1548 GMT   Juho
• [EM] Kevin & Lomax replies   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kevin's SFC objection   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kevin, criteria, 22 Feb, 1603 GMT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kevin, SFC   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kevin criteria reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] L1 distance, Condorcet, etc [Ossipoff]   Warren Smith
• [EM] L1 distance, Condorcet, etc [Ossipoff]   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] L1 distance, Condorcet, etc [Ossipoff]   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] L1 distance, Condorcet, etc [Ossipoff]   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Linked issues, 1-dimensional political spectrum   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Linked issues, 1-dimensional political spectrum   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Linked issues, 1-dimensional political spectrum   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Linked issues, 1-dimensional political spectrum (correcting Ossipoff AGAIN)   Warren Smith
• [EM] Lomax reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Lomax SFC & RV reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MAMPO & MDDA are opposite counterparts   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA   Chris Benham
• [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MAMPO is the most deluxe simple alternative method   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MAMPO is the most deluxe simple alternative method   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Margins examples   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Margins examples   Juho
• [EM] Margins examples   Juho
• [EM] Margins examples   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MCA, IRNR, IEVS, retraction   Warren Smith
• [EM] MCA, MAMPO, etc.   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Minor corrections to Webster derivation   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Morally best: equal reprsentation expectation for all   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] more Condorcet mythology and other information   Warren Smith
• [EM] more Condorcet mythology and other information   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] More on city block distance, Condorcet winners, and social-utility maximizers   Warren Smith
• [EM] multidimensional medians   Warren Smith
• [EM] multidimensional medians   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] multidimensional medians   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] My apologies to Brian Olsen   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] nastier median+L1 counterexample   Warren Smith
• [EM] Never propose Approval balloting   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] One more brief answer   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Participation reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Poll addenda   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] presidential poll   Warren Smith
• [EM] Proposal   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Random and systematic   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea   Warren Smith
• [EM] Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea   Chris Benham
• [EM] Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] range voting - better than Condorcet for purpose of generating Condocet winners...   Warren Smith
• [EM] range voting - better than Condorcet for purpose of generating Condocet winners...   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] range voting - better than Condorcet for purpose of generating Condocet winners...   David Cary
• [EM] Rank methods for if SSD is rejected   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Rank methods for public proposal   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] RE : Condorcet vs RV   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : CW & SU (response to Ossipoff false claims)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Kevin, SFC   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Kevin criteria reply   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : MAMPO is the most deluxe simple alternative method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : MAMPO is the most deluxe simple alternative method   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea   Warren Smith
• [EM] RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea   Warren Smith
• [EM] RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea   Warren Smith
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Juho
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: MAMPO is probably better than MDDA   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: A few concluding points about SFC, CC, method choice, etc.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: replies to Ossipoff re Range Voting; explanation of latest RV results   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: SFC   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : The list's complete rejection of the poll   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : The list's complete rejection of the poll   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] RE : The list's complete rejection of the poll   Juho
• [EM] RE : The list's complete rejection of the poll   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] replies to Ossipoff re Range Voting; explanation of latest RV results   Warren Smith
• [EM] replies to Ossipoff re Range Voting; explanation of latest RV results   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] replies to Ossipoff re Range Voting; explanation of latest RV results   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] replies to Ossipoff re Range Voting; explanation of latest RV results   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Replies to various people on Condorcet vs RV   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] replies to various people re IEVS simulations   Warren Smith
• [EM] reply to Heitzig   Warren Smith
• [EM] Reply to Warren's website   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] SFC   Warren Smith
• [EM] SFC   Chris Benham
• [EM] SFC   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] SFC, condorcet, participation, full support of A>B and B>C at same time   Warren Smith
• [EM] SFC[2]   Warren Smith
• [EM] SFC[2]   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] SFC and Conodrcet "full support of A>B and B>C at same time"   Warren Smith
• [EM] SFC and Conodrcet "full support of A>B and B>C at same time"   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] small states really underrepresented? (Banzhaf myth)   Warren Smith
• [EM] small states really underrepresented? (Banzhaf myth)   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Sorry, I accidentally posted Juho reply twice   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] SSD or Borda for Utopian electorate?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] SSD or Borda for Utopian electorate?   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] SU - some understanding   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] The list's complete rejection of the poll   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] The list's complete rejection of the poll   Chris Backert
• [EM] The list's complete rejection of the poll   Elisabeth Varin
• [EM] Then what's wrong with Random-Ballot?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Then what's wrong with Random-Ballot?   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] The sincere Nash equilibrium test   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] The test could be a criterion   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] typo in comments on Chris's "SFC"   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] typo in forms of "equality" and "efficiency"   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] UncAAO   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Unsubscribing   Don St. Jean
• [EM] Unsubscribing   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] utilities, Gini, and lotteries   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] utility   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Voted ballot   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] voting methods   Warren Smith
• [EM] Warren's SFC example   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren reply, 2/13/07, 0838 GMT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren RV reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Webster clarification   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Weighted Webster, Warren, and I   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Weighted Webster, Warren, and I   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] what's wrong with random ballot (Hay voting)   Warren Smith
• [EM] What is good apportionment?   Brian Olson
• [EM] What is good apportionment?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] What is good apportionment?   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   David Cary
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Michael Poole
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Michael Poole
• [EM] Whoops! Condorcet vis-a-vis L1 distance situation = even worse than I thought   Warren Smith
• [EM] Whoops! Condorcet vis-a-vis L1 distance situation = even worse than I thought   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination?   Jan Kok
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination?   Juho
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination?   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination?   Warren Smith
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-partydomination?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-partydomination?   Jan Kok
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-partydomination?   Juho
• [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to2-partydomination?   Michael Ossipoff

Last message date: Wed Feb 28 16:11:48 PST 2007
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:32:57 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...