[EM] RE : Randomized MCA, new weird voting method idea
Warren Smith
wds at math.temple.edu
Thu Feb 15 16:54:54 PST 2007
by the way, I should make it clear that I'm not speculating.
The simulations show that MCA does exactly the same thing
as approval voting does with huge (99.999%) probability, if
the number of voters is made large.
IEVS reports that MCA is better than approval voting, but the only
reason for that is because of elections with SMALL numbers of voters.
wds
http://rangevoting.org
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list