April 2014 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Apr 1 16:36:34 PDT 2014
Ending: Wed Apr 30 23:27:25 PDT 2014
Messages: 106

• [EM] The Stable Approval Potential Criterion (SAPC)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A question about Random Pair   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] A question about Random Pair   Markus Schulze
• [EM] A Chicken Proof, Monotonic Method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A Chicken Proof, Monotonic Method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] A Chicken Proof, Monotonic Method   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A Chicken Proof, Monotonic Method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A Chicken Proof Monotonic Method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   Forest Simmons
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   Forest Simmons
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   C.Benham
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   Forest Simmons
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   Forest Simmons
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   C.Benham
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   Forest Simmons
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   C.Benham
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Fwd: TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] TACC (total approval chain climbing) example   C.Benham
• [EM] The NPVIC would allow approval voting   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Fwd: Is Chain Climbing really monotonic??   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Fwd: Is Chain Climbing really independent of clones??   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Fwd: Does Chain Climbing fail Resolvability?? (was Re: Is Chain Climbing really monotonic??)   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 118, Issue 8   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 118, Issue 8   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 118, Issue 8   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Two typos in my post   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MinMax Losing Votes (equal-ranking whole) Margins   C.Benham
• [EM] MinMax Losing Votes (equal-ranking whole) Margins   C.Benham
• [EM] monotonicity + clone independence = Condorcet?   Ross Hyman
• [EM] monotonicity + clone independence = Condorcet?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Chain Climbing   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Chain Climbing   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Chain Climbing   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Chain Climbing   Michael Allan
• [EM] Chain Climbing   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Chain Climbing - (aside) Mutual exclusion between decision and reason   Michael Allan
• No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
    • [EM] 3 Choices - Condorcet - Approval tiebreaker   DNOW1 at aol.com
    • [EM] (list problem) Lengthy 'no subject' thread in archive   Michael Allan
    • [EM] (list problem) Lengthy 'no subject' thread in archive   Kevin Venzke
    • [EM] (list problem) Lengthy 'no subject' thread in archive   Rob Lanphier
    • [EM] (list problem) Lengthy 'no subject' thread in archive   Michael Allan
    • [EM] acceptable Chicken Proof methods (was chain climbing)   Forest Simmons
    • [EM] Benham's method looks best, among the Smith + CD methods   Michael Ossipoff
    • [EM] Omission in my post: B is the most favorite.   Michael Ossipoff
    • [EM] Correction: Approval Margins fails Chicken Dilemma   C.Benham
    • [EM] Approval Sorted Margins "correction"   Forest Simmons
    • [EM] Approval Margins example   Forest Simmons
    • [EM] Benham's Method looks best among Smith + CD methods   Forest Simmons
    • [EM] Benham's Method looks best among Smith + CD methods   Michael Ossipoff
    • [EM] Benham's Method looks best among Smith + CD methods   C.Benham
    • [EM] Benham's Method looks best among Smith + CD methods   Forest Simmons
    • [EM] Benham's Method looks best among Smith + CD methods   C.Benham
    • [EM] Benham's Method looks best among Smith + CD methods   Forest Simmons
    • [EM] Benham's method looks best ...   Forest Simmons
    • [EM] Is this another formulation of Benham's new method?   Forest Simmons
    • [EM] Woodall's Whacky & Zany Criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF

Last message date: Wed Apr 30 23:27:25 PDT 2014
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:36:12 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...