May 2007 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue May 1 17:40:31 PDT 2007
Ending: Tue May 29 11:36:25 PDT 2007
Messages: 94

• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Chris Backert
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Chris Backert
• [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting   Chris Backert
• [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting   Chris Backert
• [EM] Rivest+Smith secure (Re: danger of coercion)   Peter Barath
• [EM] Circular paradox (Re: maybe a new variant of Condorcet)   Peter Barath
• [EM] A small remark about the Schulze-method   Peter Barath
• [EM] Does this method already have a name?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Conditional Approval (was "Does this method have a name?")   Chris Benham
• [EM] First U.S. Scientific Election Audit Reveals Voting System Flaws but Questions Remain Unanswered   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] The House Administration Committee Sends Voter Confidence Bill to House Floor   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Support Clean Elections in 2008   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Important Facts About "Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act"   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Important Facts About "Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act"   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Voting chaos   James Gilmour
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   James Gilmour
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   James Gilmour
• [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting   James Gilmour
• [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting   James Gilmour
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   James Gilmour
• [EM] Meek's Method/approval hybrid   James Gilmour
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Juho
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Juho
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Juho
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Juho
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Juho
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Juho
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Juho
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Juho
• [EM] Presidential debate ordering   Juho
• [EM] theorems about "point runoff" systems   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Dartmouth uses Approval Voting to elect trustees   Jan Kok
• [EM] MMPO and Raynaud   Gervase Lam
• [EM] MMPO and Raynaud   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Voting chaos   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Student government - what voting system to recommend?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] theorems about "point runoff" systems   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] theorems about "point runoff" systems   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] First U.S. Scientific Election Audit Reveals Voting System Flaws but Questions Remain Unanswered   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] First U.S. Scientific Election Audit Reveals Voting System Flaws but Questions Remain Unanswered   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] First U.S. Scientific Election Audit Reveals Voting System Flaws but Questions Remain Unanswered   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] stratified renormalisation for elections   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Asset Voting from EM archives   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [RangeVoting] Dartmouth uses Approval Voting to elect trustees   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Confirmed advice for readers disturbed by my posts.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Meek's Method/approval hybrid   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Voting chaos   Brian Olson
• [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting   Brian Olson
• [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting   Brian Olson
• [EM] theorems about "point runoff" systems   Michael Poole
• [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation   Michael Poole
• [EM] A small remark about the Schulze-method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Does this method already have a name?   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Does this method already have a name?   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Does this method already have a name?   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Does this method have a name?   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Conditional Approval (was "Does this method have a name?")   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] theorems about "point runoff" systems   Warren Smith
• [EM] theorems about "point runoff" systems   Warren Smith
• [EM] Presidential debate ordering   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] stratified renormalisation for elections   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] Presidential debate ordering   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] Rational Voters discussion BBC Radio 4   Stephen Turner
• [EM] RE : MMPO and Raynaud   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Does this method already have a name?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   peter barath
• [EM] Presidential debate ordering   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] stratified renormalisation for elections   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] stratified renormalisation for elections   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Meek's Method/approval hybrid   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 35, Issue 4   diegotello at tse.gov.ec

Last message date: Tue May 29 11:36:25 PDT 2007
Archived on: Tue May 29 11:36:31 PDT 2007

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...