January 2014 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed Jan 1 20:25:49 PST 2014
Ending: Sun Jan 26 05:18:20 PST 2014
Messages: 71

• [EM] Does it satisfy Droop proportionality, monotonicity, and clone independence?   Ross Hyman
• [EM] Does it satisfy Droop proportionality, monotonicity, and clone independence?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Does it satisfy Droop proportionality, monotonicity, and clone independence?   Ross Hyman
• [EM] Does it satisfy Droop proportionality, monotonicity, and clone independence?   Ross Hyman
• [EM] Comments on a posting from Benjamin Grant   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Comments on a posting from Benjamin Grant   Dick Burkhart
• [EM] Comments on a posting from Benjamin Grant   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Comments on a posting from Benjamin Grant   Dick Burkhart
• [EM] Borda?????   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Borda?????   Dick Burkhart
• [EM] Borda?????   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Borda?????   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Borda?????   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Borda?????   Dick Burkhart
• [EM] Borda?????   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Comments on a posting from Benjamin Grant   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Comments on a posting from Benjamin Grant   Dick Burkhart
• [EM] Comments on a posting from Benjamin Grant   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Comments on a posting from Benjamin Grant   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] The CW is alway the SU maximizer   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Markus: Your deterministic RP example, with HDRP   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Smith-like sets   Peter Gustafsson
• [EM] Smith-like sets   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] New BR numbers (preliminary)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #10006] Re: New BR numbers (preliminary)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] New BR numbers (preliminary)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] New BR numbers (preliminary)   Toby Pereira
• [EM] New BR numbers (preliminary)   Toby Pereira
• [EM] Kevin: CD definitions and comply-abie-ness   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Vidar Wahlberg
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus: Demonstration that Benham & Woodall meet CD   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Markus: Why Benham, Woodall, and IRV meet CD   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Election Law Journal: The Law of Deliberative Democracy   Michael Allan
• [EM] Election Law Journal: The Law of Deliberative Democracy   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Election Law Journal: The Law of Deliberative Democracy   Michael Allan
• [EM] Voting X over Y could be defined with respect to the method whose voting is being discussed.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Voting X over Y could be defined with respect to the method whose voting is being discussed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] 2 precise and universally-applicable definitions of voting X over Y   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 2 precise and universally-applicable definitions of voting X over Y   Juho Laatu
• [EM] 2 precise and universally-applicable definitions of voting X over Y   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 2 precise and universally-applicable definitions of voting X over Y   Juho Laatu
• [EM] 2 precise and universally-applicable definitions of voting X over Y   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 2 precise and universally-applicable definitions of voting X over Y   Juho Laatu
• [EM] 2 precise and universally-applicable definitions of voting X over Y   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 2 precise and universally-applicable definitions of voting X over Y   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Addendum to 1st version of the many-voter definition of voting X over Y   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] CD, briefer, better-workng, and with Juho's clarifications   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] CD, briefer, better-workng, and with Juho's clarifications   Juho Laatu
• [EM] CD, briefer, better-workng, and with Juho's clarifications   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] CD, briefer, better-workng, and with Juho's clarifications   Juho Laatu
• [EM] CD, briefer, better-workng, and with Juho's clarifications   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] CD, briefer, better-workng, and with Juho's clarifications   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Oops! CD still doesn't apply to Plurality, but that's ok.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] One-sided coalitions don't count   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Other simple CD?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Fwd: MAM dominance-order by Borda or Score, instead of random ballot?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] No equal defeat in many-voter elections. Therefore, no Borda strategy incentive.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MAM(Borda or Score) & Clone-Independence   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Post-count options help voting-systems, especially rank methods.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A further improved (and more complex) Condorcet/Sainte-Lague hybrid   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Condorcet as a way of getting around path dependence   Kristofer Munsterhjelm

Last message date: Sun Jan 26 05:18:20 PST 2014
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:36:10 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...