October 2009 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Oct 5 12:12:20 PDT 2009
Ending: Sat Oct 31 18:21:17 PDT 2009
Messages: 52

• [EM] A multiwinner election method based on Kemeny   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] A multiwinner election method based on Kemeny   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] A multiwinner election method based on Kemeny   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes. :)   Michael Rouse
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes. :)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Bolting proportionality onto the Kemeny method   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Bolting proportionality onto the Kemeny method   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] New simple kind of party-based proportionality, avoiding deweighting, and using range-style ballots   Warren Smith
• [EM] New simple kind of party-based proportionality, avoiding deweighting, and using range-style ballots   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] New simple kind of party-based proportionality, avoiding deweighting, and using range-style ballots   Warren Smith
• [EM] New simple kind of party-based proportionality, avoiding deweighting, and using range-style ballots   Warren Smith
• [EM] New simple kind of party-based proportionality, avoiding deweighting, and using range-style ballots   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes. :)   Michael Rouse
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes. :)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes. :)   Michael Rouse
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes. :)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes. :)   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes. :)   Juho
• [EM] Divisor method equivalence   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Divisor method equivalence   Dan Bishop
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes. :)   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes. :)   Juho
• [EM] (Possibly) new method/request for voting paradoxes.   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] A different "strategyproofness" notion   Warren Smith
• [EM] A different "strategyproofness" notion   Michael Allan
• [EM] A different "strategyproofness" notion   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] A different "strategyproofness" notion   Warren Smith
• [EM] A different "strategyproofness" notion   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] A different "strategyproofness" notion   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] A different "strategyproofness" notion   Warren Smith
• [EM] SEC quickly maximizes total utility in spatial model   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] SEC quickly maximizes total utility in spatial model   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] SEC quickly maximizes total utility in spatial model   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] SEC quickly maximizes total utility in spatial model   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] SEC quickly maximizes total utility in spatial model   peter barath
• [EM] SEC quickly maximizes total utility in spatial model   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   James Gilmour
• [EM] A less artificial multiwinner Kemeny method   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   James Gilmour
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

Last message date: Sat Oct 31 18:21:17 PDT 2009
Archived on: Sat Oct 31 18:33:09 PDT 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...