November 2006 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed Nov 1 03:14:12 PST 2006
Ending: Sat Nov 25 07:21:27 PST 2006
Messages: 155

• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Chris Benham
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Chris Benham
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Chris Benham
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Chris Benham
• [EM] Range voting fails IIA   Chris Benham
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Chris Benham
• [EM] Range voting fails IIA   Chris Benham
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Chris Benham
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Chris Benham
• [EM] Range Voting Strategy   Chris Benham
• [EM] Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?   Dan Bishop
• [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation   David Cary
• [EM] Range voting fails IIA   David Cary
• [EM] IRV...   David Cary
• [EM] Range voting fails IIA   David Cary
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   David Cary
• [EM] Range Voting strategy   David Cary
• [EM] STV when applied to choosing pizza toppings   James Gilmour
• [EM] STV when applied to choosing pizza toppings   James Gilmour
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   James Gilmour
• [EM] Range Voting Strategy   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Ranked Preference benefits   Juho
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Juho
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Juho
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Juho
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Juho
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Juho
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Juho
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Juho
• [EM] Range Voting Strategy   Juho
• [EM] Range Voting Strategy   Juho
• [EM] RE : Re: Range Voting Strategy   Juho
• [EM] Range Voting strategy   Juho
• [EM] Range Voting strategy   Juho
• [EM] Ranked Preferences   Juho
• [EM] Ranked Preferences   Juho
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Juho
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Juho
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Juho
• [EM] Florida 2000 being repeated in Slovenia :)   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Ranked Preferences, Range   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Condordet Criterion & Method   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Majority Is When?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Jan Kok
• [EM] STV when applied to choosing pizza toppings   Nathan Larson
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Range voting fails IIA   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Range voting fails IIA   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Range voting fails IIA   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] STV/Asset Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] STV/Asset Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Combating the Approval Burr dilemma   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Combating the Approval Burr dilemma   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: Combating the Approval Burr dilemma   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Combatting the Burr dilemna   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] IRV...   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   Brian Olson
• [EM] "punchscan" competition for three-ballot   Brian Olson
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   Brian Olson
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   Brian Olson
• [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory   Antonio Oneala
• [EM] Combatting the Burr dilemna   Antonio Oneala
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Michael Poole
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Michael Poole
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Michael Poole
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Michael Poole
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Michael Poole
• [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Michael Poole
• [EM] Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?   Michael Poole
• [EM] Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?   Monkey Puzzle
• [EM] Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?   Monkey Puzzle
• [EM] Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?   Monkey Puzzle
• [EM] RE : Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?   Monkey Puzzle
• [EM] RE : Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?   Monkey Puzzle
• [EM] STV/Asset Voting   Bob Richard
• [EM] RE : Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not0-100?   Bob Richard
• [EM] Combating the Approval Burr dilemma   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Range voting zero-info strategy simulation   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Range voting zero-info strategy simulation   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Old U.S. Adversary Poised for Comeback - washingtonpost.com   Allen Smith
• [EM] Range voting fails IIA?   Warren Smith
• [EM] IRV theorem   Warren Smith
• [EM] Range Voting Strategy   Warren Smith
• [EM] Range Voting strategy   Warren Smith
• [EM] Range Voting strategy   Warren Smith
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   Warren Smith
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting zero-info strategy simulation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Range Voting Strategy   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Another method on approval ballots (approval-limited minimum opposition)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Range voting zero-info strategy simulation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Combating the Approval Burr dilemma   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Combating the Approval Burr dilemma   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Combating the Approval Burr dilemma   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] why 0-99 in range voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Oh my God, they patented Nanson's method   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] using single seat elections as a first stage for a PR election   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Electoral college competition rule   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Thompson insurance like voting for a legislature   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] STV when applied to choosing pizza toppings   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Combating the Approval Burr dilemma   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] Combatting the Burr dilemna   raphfrk at netscape.net

Last message date: Sat Nov 25 07:21:27 PST 2006
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:32:47 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...