[EM] Naive question about Range Voting -- why 0-99 and not 0-100?

[Dan Bishop]

Monkey Puzzle wrote:
> On 20 Nov 2006 10:47:24 -0800, Michael Poole wrote:
> 
>>Monkey Puzzle writes:
>>
>>>Hi folks,
>>>
>>>Is there any reason to not allow range voting with scores between 0
>>>and 100?  If the intent is to allow a full range of voter expression,
>>>why not go the extra point?  I thought the whole idea was to avoid
>>>imposing a structural restriction on the voters.
>>
>>Is there any reason *to* allow voting with a score of 100?
> 
> Yes.  It is easily divisible.

Then why not have a maximum score of 60 or 120?