[EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule
Jonathan Lundell
jlundell at pobox.com
Wed Nov 8 19:16:04 PST 2006
At 6:50 PM -0800 11/8/06, Brian Olson wrote:
>0.5% is readily achievable by my solver. A US House district is
>300000000/435 = 689655 people. 1% of that is of course a 6897 person
>variability from district to district. I think people might whine
>about this; it affects the degree to which they are represented. It
>won't necessarily be a logical argument.
>
>Also the wider the margin the greater possibility for distortion to
>malicious ends (depending on the exact method of picking within the
>constraint). Of course current districts are equal population to
>within 100 people according to Census data and are still distorted in
>some extreme ways.
Wyoming and Montana each have one district, and 509,294 & 935,670
people respectively. Rhode Island has two districts and 1,076,189
people.
The 1% rule (or whatever) must be intra-state only.
--
/Jonathan Lundell.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list