May 2005 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sun May 1 06:41:43 PDT 2005
Ending: Tue May 31 22:09:59 PDT 2005
Messages: 323

• [EM] STV anomaly - Part of my vote went to someone who was not on my list   Markus Schulze
• [EM] DMC/RAV vs. Approval   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Approval doesn't meaningfully meet Majority or Mutual Majority.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Approval doesn't meaningfully meet Majority or Mutual Majority.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Approval doesn't meaningfully meet Majority or Mutual Majority.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] DMC/RAV vs. Approval   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] James--The burden of doubt, part 1   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Condorcet/IRV politics   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] another Condorcet/IRV politics question   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: DMC/RAV vs. Approval   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] another Condorcet/IRV politics question   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] percentage support   Curt Siffert
• [EM] percentage support   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] percentage support   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] percentage support - residual approval weights   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] percentage support   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] percentage support   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State   Russ Paielli
• [EM] DMC/RAV vs. Approval   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Cardinal Pairwise fails SFC.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Preferences and ballots typo   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] part 2 of Re: approval doesn't meaningfully meet majority or mutual majority   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: DMC/RAV vs. Approval   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: DMC/RAV vs. Approval   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Cardinal Pairwise fails SFC.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] (humor) not the lesser of two evils   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] RE: percentage support   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] RE: approval and pareto   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] James, 4 March, '05, 0435 GMT (meaninfgulness and sameness)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James, 5/3/05, 2135   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James--Then CP passes SFC, with a patch   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Percentage Support   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Accidental duplicate posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James--IRV mitigation compromises   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Does Approval pass Pareto? Which Pareto?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Percentage Support   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] James, 4 March, '05, 0435 GMT (meaninfgulness and sameness)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] RE: approval and pareto   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] proof that ER-IRV(fractional) meets WDSC?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] proof that ER-IRV(fractional) meets WDSC?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] percentage support continued   Curt Siffert
• [EM] percentage support continued   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] proof that ER-IRV(fractional) meets WDSC?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Does Approval pass Pareto? Which Pareto?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] percentage support continued   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] percentage support continued   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] percentage support continued   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Pareto   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus--You didn't prove that ERIRV(fractional) fails WDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus--You didn't prove that ERIRV(fractional) fails WDSC   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: AWP versus DMC and AM   Chris Benham
• [EM] Markus--Your example does show that ERIRV(f) fails WDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: James, meaningfulness and sameness   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Pareto   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James, SFC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] British Election and Duverger's Law   Alex Small
• [EM] Mike: malfunctioning criteria?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: British Election and Duverger's Law   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] "Approval Later-no-Harm", (was "AWP versus DMC and AM")   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Approval Later-no-Harm", (was "AWP versus DMC and AM")   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Approval Later-no-Harm", (was "AWP versus DMC and AM")   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm",   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] 2004 baseball grid, revisited   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: Malfunctioning criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James, SFC , Contd.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Duverger's law and British elections   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James, SFC   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] general understanding of majority and mutual majority criteria?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] AWP vs. S/WPO   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Malfunctioning criteria   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Malfunctioning criteria   Russ Paielli
• [EM] British Election and Duverger's Law   Russ Paielli
• [EM] James' mutually-contradictory critrerion definitions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Part 1, Re: James, SFC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James' mutually-contradictory critrerion definitions   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Part 2, Re: James, SFC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm",   Chris Benham
• [EM] British Election and Duverger's Law   Anthony Duff
• [EM] Re: British Election and Duverger's Law   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm",   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: British Election and Duverger's Law   James Gilmour
• [EM] Russ's criteriai postingse   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Russ's criteriai postings   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Mike: WV (was: SFC)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Mike: CWP (was: SFC)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion   Russ Paielli
• [EM] fixing DMC page on electowiki   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] fixing DMC page on electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Over the top personal comments   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Over the top personal comments   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Over the top personal comments   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Should we say a criterion implicitly doesnt apply to a method?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Over the top personal comments   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Should we say a criterion implicitly doesnt apply to a method?   Russ Paielli
• [EM] link to web site   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] update on classroom creation question   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm",   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Summary--Unstated CC assumptions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Clarification   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Saddam Declares Victory!   Russ Paielli
• [EM] over the top personal comments, revisited   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] over the top personal comments, revisited   Russ Paielli
• [EM] over the top personal comments, revisited   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] London newspaper campaigning for voting reform   Stephen Turner
• [EM] problematic participants   Andrew Myers
• [EM] London newspaper campaigning for voting reform   James Gilmour
• [EM] Welcome! / Procedural version of DFC   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] irony   Alex Small
• [EM] irony   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem flawed?   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement.   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement.   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] problematic participants   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem flawed?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?   Bill Clark
• [EM] irony   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem flawed?   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] WV methods fail FBC with 3 candidates   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Goodbye Gerrymandering.   stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
• [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots (was Approval Later-no-Harm)   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] arrow's, wikipedia part II   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Goodbye Gerrymandering.   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Goodbye Gerrymandering.   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: WV methods fail FBC with 3 candidates   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Paul: Logical arguments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Name Capitalization. enforcement, etc.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: WV methods fail FBC with 3 candidates   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Need copy of digest issue 22 (never received)   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Welcome! / Procedural version of DFC   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] FBC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem   Russ Paielli
• [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Criteria reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on additional posting about Arrow's CC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: The issue of comments about Arrow's impossibility theorem   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Criteria reply   Russ Paielli
• [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem   Alex Small
• [EM] Criteria reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem   Curt Siffert
• [EM] One more thought on Arrow   Alex Small
• [EM] FBC   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] DMC/RAV and FBC   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Criteria reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Paul doesn't understand something that I said   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Paul doesn't understand something that I said   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Markus--Who introduced SSD to EM?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on Alex's 2nd Arrow posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Criteria reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Comments on Alex's 2nd Arrow posting   Bill Clark
• [EM] strange 2-dim. fun example   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem   Russ Paielli
• [EM] More Paul   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 18 May, '05, 0423   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Criteria reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Canadians on the way...   stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
• [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] IRV with approval   Sean Harris
• [EM] Criteria reply   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Canadians on the way...   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV with approval   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] IRV with approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Criteria reply   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Criteria reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Criteria reply   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Election via Proxies   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] A Condorcet-like method that satisfies FBC (I believe)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Markus, 19 May, '05, 0114   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] New policy: No personal criticisms in on-topic discussion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election via Proxies - correction   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Election via Proxies   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Part 2, Re: Mike: Strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election via Proxies   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Criteria reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability   Chris Benham
• [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots (was Approval Later-no-Harm)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: A Condorcet-like method that satisfies FBC (I believe)   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: A Condorcet-like method that satisfies FBC (I believe)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE: fun example   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] RE: fun example   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] An interesting different method of combining results across a spectrum   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] An interesting different method of combining results across a spectrum   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: An interesting different method of combining results across a spectrum   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] The truth about Instant Runoff Voting   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Election via Proxies   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] RE: fun example   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] IRV with approval   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots   Chris Benham
• [EM] Election via Proxies   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Election via Proxies   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] RE: resistance to raffles (was assumption of sincere ballots)   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Eurovision Song Contest results   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Markus, 22 Marach, '05, 0318 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Month typo   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin--The 3-slot method   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability   Chris Benham
• [EM] Kevin--The 3-slot method, FBC, MMPO   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Criteria reply   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Criteria reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] MMPO satisfies FBC in the general case   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] An attempt at a method satisfying FBC and SDSC   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] It's just that IRV isn't a significant reform   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 23 May, 0500 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election via Proxies   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Criteria reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] It's just that IRV isn't a significant reform   Chris Benham
• [EM] It's just that IRV isn't a significant reform   Eric Gorr
• [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability   Chris Benham
• [EM] FBC + majority defensive strategy criteria--2nd generation best methods   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FBC + majority defensive strategy criteria--2nd generation best methods   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Insignificant improvement is evil?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FBC + majority defensive strategy criteria--2nd generation best methods   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] The last time that I waste the time to reply to Markus   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Clarification to people I don't reply to   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] RE: MMPO satisfies FBC in the general case   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] MMPO satisfies FBC in the general case   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Election via Proxies   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] MMPO satisfies FBC in the general case   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Criteria reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] RE: MMPO, FBC, Raynaud   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MMPO, MinGS   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] MMPO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] RE: CIBR   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method   Chris Benham
• [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] RE: CIBR   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] RE: MMPO   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] ER-IRV(whole)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] CDTT,IRV   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Chris: various topics   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Criterias - weighted margins   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Independence from Clones Criterion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] CDTT,IRV   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Reward oiffensive truncation to avoid order-reversal? :-)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMPO's name   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMPO's name   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] suggestion for MMPO/Approval hybrid   Russ Paielli
• [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem   Curt Siffert
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Chris: various topics   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   James Gilmour
• [EM] Chris: various topics   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] weak burial resistance criteria   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] weak burial resistance criteria   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] CDTT,IRV   Chris Benham
• [EM] CIBR examples, and its CC failure   Bishop, Daniel J
• [EM] CIBR examples, and its CC failure   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] CDTT,IRV (James)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] suggestion for MMPO/Approval hybrid   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: suggestion for MMPO/Approval hybrid   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] CDTT,IRV (Chris)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Juho Laatu
• [EM] percentage support   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Juho Laatu
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   James Gilmour
• [EM] Approval/Condorcet Compromise   Gervase Lam
• [EM] ER-IRV(whole)   Chris Benham
• [EM] CDTT,IRV   Chris Benham
• [EM] MMPO, contd.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Possible Multi-Winner Pairwise techniques/algorithms (Part 1)   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Election via Proxies   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Possible Multi-Winner Pairwise techniques/algorithms (Part 1)   Gervase Lam
• [EM] CDTT, IRV is IRV with pre-elimination   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election via Proxies   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Reply to December MMPO comments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to December MMPO comments   Chris Benham
• [EM] CDTT, IRV is IRV with pre-elimination   Chris Benham
• [EM] CDTT, IRV is IRV with pre-elimination   Chris Benham
• [EM] CDTT,IRV (Chris)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Monotonicity example: CDTT,FPP vs CDTT//FPP   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Proof that the CDTT is monotonic   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Reward oiffensive truncation to avoid order-reversal? :-)   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voterstrategy   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Declaring victory?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   James Gilmour
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voterstrategy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Not obviously untrue   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   Kevin Venzke

Last message date: Tue May 31 22:09:59 PDT 2005
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:32:06 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...