April 1997 Archives by thread
Starting: Tue Apr 1 16:10:34 PST 1997
Ending: Tue Apr 29 19:20:45 PDT 1997
Messages: 35
- Instant Consensus voting method
Steve Eppley
- The Ideal Single Winner Method
New Democracy
- "Honest" decision systems
Saari at aol.com
- Ideal (?) Instant Consensus voting method
Saari at aol.com
- Ideal (?) Instant Consensus voting method
John De Lasaux
- Doing What has To Be Done
New Democracy
- Ideal (?) Gaussian Consensus
New Democracy
- Ideal (?) Gaussian Consensus
Saari at aol.com
- Gaussian Consensus Revisited
New Democracy
- Does the Method Confirm the Majority Winner?
New Democracy
- A Second Test of a Single Seat Election Method
New Democracy
- A Second Test of a Single Seat Election Method
Saari at aol.com
- Reply to Saari on Approval Voting
New Democracy
- Reply to Saari on Approval Voting
Saari at aol.com
- Preference Votin vs Approval Voting
New Democracy
- Preference Votin vs Approval Voting
John De Lasaux
- Preference Votin vs Approval Voting
Rob Lanphier
- Rated voting puzzle question
Saari at aol.com
- Rated voting puzzle question
New Democracy
- Woes with the Elections Reform List
New Democracy
- Woes with the Elections Reform List
Hugh Tobin
- Reply to Hugh Tobin on Condorcet
New Democracy
- Reply to Hugh Tobin on Condorcet
Hugh Tobin
- Question
Stephen Hegarty
- We Will Reveal No Preference Before Its Time
New Democracy
- We Will Reveal No Preference Before Its Time
John De Lasaux
- Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries
Hugh Tobin
- Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries
John De Lasaux
- Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries
Hugh Tobin
- Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries
John De Lasaux
- Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries
John De Lasaux
- Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries
Hugh Tobin
- Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries
New Democracy
- Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries
John De Lasaux
- Rob Lanphier's control letter
New Democracy
Last message date:
Tue Apr 29 19:20:45 PDT 1997
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:29:41 PDT 2014
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).