[EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
clintonmead at gmail.com
Tue Jan 31 00:16:52 PST 2012
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm <
km_elmet at lavabit.com> wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 07:14 AM, Clinton Mead wrote:
>> Why not simply IRV until 500 candidates are left.
> STV would probably be better - or if you want a weighted assembly,
> continuous cumulative voting (which is like RV except every ballot's rating
> is divided by the sum of the undivided ratings on that ballot).
Why STV? The original poster wanted elected representatives to have votes
proportional to their electoral support yes? There's no need for fractional
transfers from elected candidates then.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Election-Methods