[EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC

[Jameson Quinn]

But conditionality-by-mutuality violates later-no-help, and as such, raises
the spectre of a DH3 <http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/DH3>-like scenario.

Jameson

2012/2/15 MIKE OSSIPOFF <nkklrp at hotmail.com>

>  It probably does, and, if so, I no longer propose
> conditionality-by-top-count.
>
> But conditionality-by-mutuality doesn't have that problem, and so I still
> propose that, for voting-options
> in Approval elections, and for freestanding voting systems.
>
> Mike Ossipoff
>
>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20120215/fb10ae9e/attachment-0004.htm>