[EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC

Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_elmet at lavabit.com
Sun Feb 19 05:48:36 PST 2012

On 02/15/2012 06:08 PM, Jameson Quinn wrote:
> But conditionality-by-mutuality violates later-no-help, and as such,
> raises the spectre of a DH3 <http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/DH3>-like
> scenario.

I think you can have burial in methods that pass LNHelp too, unless the 
method also passes LNHarm. LNHelp-complying methods could still reward a 
move from, say, A>B>C to A>C>B (where the point would be to keep B from 
winning more than to get A to win).

See, for instance, Kevin Venzke's post: 
, or James Green-Armytage's: 

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list