[EM] brainstorm'n electoral calculus on acid...
David L Wetzell
wetzelld at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 15:40:44 PST 2012
>
> 1. I disagree; I do not think IRV will do well in the scenario you
> describe.
>
Well that's why we'd need to try it out....
>
> 2. It's too complex. We need toy models that focus on one aspect at a
> time, not anything that tries to be realistic. Think macroeconomics 101
> (saltwater), where anything that doesn't fit on one graph is put off until
> next year.
>
Nope. The whole is more than the sum of its parts. We can and should go
beyond Macro 101.
I'm willing to defend each part of the model here, but I think it as a
whole captures an environment where election rules have different effects
in a system where the center is somewhat opaque and parties are not
stationary or able to reposition themselves at will along the 1-d space
used by voters .
So "chicken"???
dlw
>
> jq
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20120203/64d93215/attachment-0004.htm>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list