[EM] Two round Condorcet / Improved TRS

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

On 2024-10-12 03:24, Chris Benham wrote:
>> "While even the paradigm of IRV retains this "few first preferences - 
>> not legitimate" view, ..."
> 
> No. it works the way it does because there isn't any other way of fixing 
> FPP's  failure of Clone-Winner while keeping compliance with 
> Later-no-Help and Later-no-Harm.

Do you mean that it's the only method that can have those three 
properties, or that it's the only FPP-based method?

If the latter, it would be interesting to know (in a theory sense) if 
there exists a method that passes all three and has fewer strategic 
nomination problems than IRV.

-km