[EM] Brief Ranked-Pairs definition

[Michael Ossipoff]

It seems to me that Meyerson & Weber said that Vote-For-1 Plurality can
elect any two candidates forever at Myerson-Weber equilibrium.

(Meyerson & Weber called their equilibrium “Voting-Equilibrium”. I think
their paper was called “A Voting Equlibrium”. It was probably in
Econometria.)

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 18:25 Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Elect the candidate not beaten among all the strongest defeats that don’t
> contradict (form any cycles with) eachother.
> ————-
> In my recent Approval-post, I forgot to mention (but have mentioned
> elsewhere) that Approval’s Myerson-Weber equilibrium is at the voter-median.
>
> i.e. Approval homes-in on where the CW is.
>
> (A Myerson-Weber equilibrium is an outcome consistent with, confirming,
> the voters’ beliefs that led to that outcome.)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240516/961004a0/attachment-0001.htm>