[EM] Poll ballots

[Toby Pereira]

 I did wonder if it might have been better to have a more general poll with just Condorcet as one thing, as I expect it would win anyway. Then we could have had another poll on Condorcet methods. Having said that, without having really looked at other people's ballots, my view has always been that Ranked Pairs was going to walk this. I suppose we'll find out shortly.
Toby
    On Thursday, 16 May 2024 at 19:49:38 BST, Closed Limelike Curves <closed.limelike.curves at gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 This is why I mentioned earlier that I'm not sure what the point of the poll is. There's just too many methods included for us to rank all of them without forgetting half of them.
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:06 AM Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de> wrote:

On 2024-05-16 18:58, Richard, the VoteFair guy wrote:
> Great work Kristofer, however ...
> 
> Not all the ballots have the same number of methods.
> 
> One of them with 24 methods omits the RCIPE method.  I don't know which 
> method is missing from the other ballot with 24 methods.
> 
> Some ballots have more than 25 methods, which I presume are write-in 
> methods.  How are these write-in methods ranked on other ballots?

The missing methods were left unranked. They're thus considered to be 
ranked equal below every explicitly ranked candidate. In addition, 
write-ins are considered unranked on the ballots that don't rank them.

Joshua Boehme didn't rank Max Strength Transitive Beatpath; and Robert 
Bristow-Johnson left Approval with runoff, MJ, RCIPE, and Double Defeat 
Hare unranked.

-km
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info

----
Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240516/fcc4c049/attachment-0001.htm>