<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp3e1c895fyahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;"><div></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">I did wonder if it might have been better to have a more general poll with just Condorcet as one thing, as I expect it would win anyway. Then we could have had another poll on Condorcet methods. Having said that, without having really looked at other people's ballots, my view has always been that Ranked Pairs was going to walk this. I suppose we'll find out shortly.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Toby</div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="ydpeb6dd38fyahoo_quoted_6740007604" class="ydpeb6dd38fyahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div>
On Thursday, 16 May 2024 at 19:49:38 BST, Closed Limelike Curves <closed.limelike.curves@gmail.com> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div id="ydpeb6dd38fyiv0119454668"><div><div dir="ltr">This is why I mentioned earlier that I'm not sure what the point of the poll is. There's just too many methods included for us to rank all of them without forgetting half of them.</div><br clear="none"><div id="ydpeb6dd38fyiv0119454668yqt45310" class="ydpeb6dd38fyiv0119454668yqt8935273019"><div class="ydpeb6dd38fyiv0119454668gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="ydpeb6dd38fyiv0119454668gmail_attr">On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:06 AM Kristofer Munsterhjelm <<a shape="rect" href="mailto:km_elmet@t-online.de" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">km_elmet@t-online.de</a>> wrote:<br clear="none"></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;" class="ydpeb6dd38fyiv0119454668gmail_quote">On 2024-05-16 18:58, Richard, the VoteFair guy wrote:<br clear="none">
> Great work Kristofer, however ...<br clear="none">
> <br clear="none">
> Not all the ballots have the same number of methods.<br clear="none">
> <br clear="none">
> One of them with 24 methods omits the RCIPE method. I don't know which <br clear="none">
> method is missing from the other ballot with 24 methods.<br clear="none">
> <br clear="none">
> Some ballots have more than 25 methods, which I presume are write-in <br clear="none">
> methods. How are these write-in methods ranked on other ballots?<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
The missing methods were left unranked. They're thus considered to be <br clear="none">
ranked equal below every explicitly ranked candidate. In addition, <br clear="none">
write-ins are considered unranked on the ballots that don't rank them.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Joshua Boehme didn't rank Max Strength Transitive Beatpath; and Robert <br clear="none">
Bristow-Johnson left Approval with runoff, MJ, RCIPE, and Double Defeat <br clear="none">
Hare unranked.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
-km<br clear="none">
----<br clear="none">
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a shape="rect" href="https://electorama.com/em" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list info<br clear="none">
</blockquote></div></div>
</div></div><div class="ydpeb6dd38fyqt8935273019" id="ydpeb6dd38fyqt80975">----<br clear="none">Election-Methods mailing list - see <a shape="rect" href="https://electorama.com/em" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list info<br clear="none"></div></div>
</div>
</div></body></html>