[EM] POLL: References (was Re: Poll, preliminary ballots)

[Closed Limelike Curves]

Yep, cardinal-Condorcet is included.

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 8:10 AM Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de>
wrote:

> On 2024-05-13 23:30, Closed Limelike Curves wrote:
> > 1. STAR
> > 2. Smith//Score
> > 3. Score
> > 4. Highest medians
> > 5. Approval, anything else that's cardinal
> > 6. Approval with runoff
> > ---- Approval cutoff ----
> > 7. Ranked Pairs
> > 8. Schulze
> > 9. Any Smith-efficients that satisfy weak defensive strategy criterion
> > ---- Second, bigger approval cutoff* ----
> > 10. Any other Smith-efficients
> > 11. Any non-Smith Condorcet methods
> > 12. RCIPE
> > 13. IRV
> > 14. Plurality
>
> Are you counting cardinal hybrids (Smith//Approval, Approval Sorted
> Margins, Double Defeat Hare) as being part of the "anything else that's
> cardinal" category? I would imagine so, but I want to be sure.
>
> As for WSDC compliance, I'm not all that sure which methods pass, so
> I'll ask the other members if they could let me know which of the
> methods pass WDSC. If nobody answers, do you want to just equal-rank all
> Smith methods equal, specify a more detailed ranking yourself, or
> something else?
>
> > *I don't like approval cutoffs. I need at least 3-4 bins. The first one
> > is what I'd do if I wanted to provide the most information, the latter
> > is "what I'd actually accept". Use the first one, I guess.
>
> Them's the breaks when it comes to Approval. But got it, I'll count
> what's above the first cutoff.
>
> -km
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
> info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240514/02de87e1/attachment.htm>