[EM] Hare

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

On 2024-05-13 05:47, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 20:23 Closed Limelike Curves 
> <closed.limelike.curves wrote:
> 
>> But allowing any /plurality-strength/ Condorcet candidate to win creates 
>> screwy burial and favorite-betrayal incentives that can end up with a 
>> unanimous favorite/least favorite winning.
> 
> I’ve told how wv Condorcet deters offensive-strategy.  …without which 
> there’s no “incentive” ( need) for favorite-burial, or any 
> defensive-strategy.

For what it's worth, I conjecture that CLC's conjecture is wrong. 
There's no out-of-hand reason I can see why Monroe's criterion should be 
incompatible with Condorcet. (Monroe's Voice of Reason fails FBC, so 
that's not it.)

But in any case, I would say that thinking before responding is indeed a 
good idea.

-km