[EM] POLL: References (was Re: Poll, preliminary ballots)

[Closed Limelike Curves]

1. STAR
2. Smith//Score
3. Score
4. Highest medians
5. Approval, anything else that's cardinal
6. Approval with runoff
---- Approval cutoff ----
7. Ranked Pairs
8. Schulze
9. Any Smith-efficients that satisfy weak defensive strategy criterion
---- Second, bigger approval cutoff* ----
10. Any other Smith-efficients
11. Any non-Smith Condorcet methods
12. RCIPE
13. IRV
14. Plurality

*I don't like approval cutoffs. I need at least 3-4 bins. The first one is
what I'd do if I wanted to provide the most information, the latter is
"what I'd actually accept". Use the first one, I guess.

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 8:26 AM Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de>
wrote:

> On 2024-05-01 17:19, fdpk69p6uq at snkmail.com wrote:
> > OK, here is my ballot:
> >
> >  1. STAR
> >  2. Smith//Score
> >  3. Condorcet methods (Baldwin, Benham, Black, Copeland//Borda, Gross
> >     Loser Elimination, MinMax(wv), RP(wv), Schulze, Schwartz-Woodall,
> >     Smith//Approval (explicit & implicit), Smith//DAC, Woodall)
> >  4. Approval with manual runoff
> >  5. Approval
> >  6. ---- Approval cutoff ----
> >  7. RCIPE
> >  8. Double Defeat, Hare
> >  9. Majority Judgement
> > 10. IRV
> > 11. Plurality
> >
> >
> > (If I made a mistake in the Condorcet line, let me know.)
>
> Margins-Sorted Approval,  Margins-Sorted Minimum Losing Votes, and Max
> Strength Transitive Beatpath are also Condorcet methods. Are you ranking
> them third as well?
>
> -km
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
> info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240513/4af60159/attachment.htm>