[EM] POLL: New deadline: 2024-05-16 05:15:00 UTC

[Richard Lung]

The fact that the ballot is in terms of "to chooose a ranking" ( all the 
entries I've seen are ) means that the list members have already chosen 
a ranked vote, rather than FPTP or the family of Cardinal voting.



On 12/05/2024 17:24, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
>
>
> We need not resubmit our vote, right?
>
> I haven't seen posted here more than a couple other ballots.  How many 
> have voted?
>
> I also am skeptical about the usefulness of the results (I presume a 
> pairwise preference matrix and approval tallies) but will be 
> interested anyway.
>
> But we need dozens voting to have anything of any significance.
>
> /Powered by Cricket Wireless/
>
> ------ Original message------
> *From: *Kristofer Munsterhjelm
> *Date: *Sun, May 12, 2024 06 :47
> *To: *Michael Ossipoff;
> *Cc: *election-methods at lists.electorama.com;
> *Subject:*[EM] POLL: New deadline: 2024-05-16 05 <tel:2024-05-16 
> 05>:15:00 UTC
>
> On2024-05-11 22  <tel:2024-05-11 22>:18, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
> > If 5 days gives more people time to choose a ranking, the deadline 
> > having caught them unprepared, then that sounds better. I vote for 5.
> > 
> > Also, more time for people to say what they meant to about method-merit.
>
> Since there's been no objection to extending the deadline, let's set the
> new deadline to 5 days from the last one.
>
> That is, the new deadline is2024-05-16 05  <tel:2024-05-16 05>:15:00 UTC.
>
> -km
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - seehttps://electorama.com/em  for list info
>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - seehttps://electorama.com/em  for list info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240512/d58119cf/attachment-0001.htm>