[EM] No. Condorcet and Hare do not share the same problem with computational complexity and process transparency.

Michael Garman michael.garman at rankthevote.us
Wed Mar 20 13:48:31 PDT 2024


No. But I'm also saying that conspiracy theorists are going to peddle
absurd claims no matter what. We shouldn’t be structuring our institutions
around how the lunatic fringe who are going to cry foul no matter what
might react.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:39 PM robert bristow-johnson <
rbj at audioimagination.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On 03/20/2024 4:26 PM EDT Michael Garman <michael.garman at rankthevote.us>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Who's the conspiracy theorist now?
> >
>
> You're being dishonest again.
>
> I'm saying that we don't give conspiracy theorists **anything** to hang
> their hat on.
>
> Police investigators and security experts have to think like criminals
> think in order to defeat them.  Do you suggest that the police
> investigators and security consultants are being criminals?
>
>
> --
>
> r b-j . _ . _ . _ . _ rbj at audioimagination.com
>
> "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
>
> .
> .
> .
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240320/10a7fc82/attachment.htm>


More information about the Election-Methods mailing list