[EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming enactment-elections

[Michael Ossipoff]

Well, actually, because my bottom-ranked alternatives aren’t going to win
anyway, I’ll just approve down to, & including, my 7th-ranked alternative.

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:19 Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> For the Approval-set, I meant:
>
> Same as what I ranked, but not IRV or Majority-Judgment
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:16 Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:16
>> Subject: Re: [EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming
>> enactment-elections
>> To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de>
>>
>>
>>
>> My ballot for the poll:
>>
>> Ranking:
>>
>> 1. Approval
>> 2. STAR
>> 3. Approval with separate runoff
>> 4. Condorcet-IRV
>> 5. RP(wv)
>> 6. MinMax(wv)
>> 7. Schulze
>> 8. Everything not listed above or below
>> 9. Majority-Judgment
>> 10. IRV
>>
>> I don’t know what merits or advantages are claimed for the 8th-place
>> alternatives. Shouldn’t vote on what I don’t know.
>>
>> Approval-set:
>>
>> Same alternatives I ranked
>>
>> Maybe most just want ranking, but I express an approval-set because I
>> like what maximizes the number of people who like the outcome.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240410/f6ffb9ce/attachment.htm>