[EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming enactment-elections

Michael Ossipoff email9648742 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 10 22:19:42 PDT 2024


For the Approval-set, I meant:

Same as what I ranked, but not IRV or Majority-Judgment

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:16 Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:16
> Subject: Re: [EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming
> enactment-elections
> To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de>
>
>
>
> My ballot for the poll:
>
> Ranking:
>
> 1. Approval
> 2. STAR
> 3. Approval with separate runoff
> 4. Condorcet-IRV
> 5. RP(wv)
> 6. MinMax(wv)
> 7. Schulze
> 8. Everything not listed above or below
> 9. Majority-Judgment
> 10. IRV
>
> I don’t know what merits or advantages are claimed for the 8th-place
> alternatives. Shouldn’t vote on what I don’t know.
>
> Approval-set:
>
> Same alternatives I ranked
>
> Maybe most just want ranking, but I express an approval-set because I like
> what maximizes the number of people who like the outcome.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240410/7ff13694/attachment.htm>


More information about the Election-Methods mailing list