[EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming enactment-elections

[Michael Ossipoff]

I blocked Kristofer, Garman, Toby, & Bristow for justifiable reasons,
stated at the time.

But anyone can relay, repost or quote anything that they say about the
poll, including nominations & ballots.

There’s no intention to not count any nomination or ballot.

I think we can easily agree that Schulze has long been the most popular
method here.

To use a new-invention-method for this poll would be inappropriate, when
there’s a long/established, well-established favorite.

Another advantage of Schulze is that relatively much people already have
program or calculators to count it…including CIVS, which seems the most
convenient & most official way to counter the poll.

I suggest using a private CIVS poll
to get a Schulze output-ranking…finishing-order.

Let’s use a CIVS private poll.

If Kristofer or Bristow have posted nominations, I’d appreciate it if
someone would re-post them.

…&. likewise for any other nominations that I might have missed.



On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 07:33 robert bristow-johnson <
rbj at audioimagination.com> wrote:

> Kristofer, what method should be used to poll on the preference on methods?
>
> *Powered by Cricket Wireless*
>
> ------ Original message------
> *From: *Kristofer Munsterhjelm
> *Date: *Sat, Apr 6, 2024 10:04
> *To: *Toby Pereira;Filip Ejlak;Michael Ossipoff;
> *Cc: *EM;
> *Subject:*Re: [EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming
> enactment-elections
>
> On 2024-04-06 09:14, Toby Pereira wrote:
> > I notice you haven't included my nominations. I'm guessing you blocked
> > me after you threw your toys out of the pram over your "Bias Free"
> > method on the Voting Theory Forum. I notice Kristofer suggested some
> > methods that aren't in the list either. I'm not sure this can really
> > count as a poll of EM members if this person has decided to selectively
> > ignore people.
>
> Maybe somebody else could run the poll? I'd nominate myself, but I've
> got two people blocked.
>
> I guess I could unplonk them for the duration if no better solution
> presents itself -- but if MO has got me blocked too, it'd be far from ideal.
>
> -km
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240406/580bbf4e/attachment-0002.htm>