[EM] Reply to Rob regarding RCV

Michael Ossipoff email9648742 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 23 12:34:13 PDT 2023

I mean the former. The people who will always vote a deplorable sleazy
corrupt POS “lesser” evil over what we’d all like, against the hopes of
nearly all of us, because they’re being routinely threatened with a greater

On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 12:26 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de>

> On 2023-09-23 20:19, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
> > But I would like to remind you that I also continue to say that
> > Condorcet, in its best versions, is my favorite, because, always
> > electing the CW, it best gets rid of the lesser-of-2-evils problem
> > (LO2E) for any & everykind of voter, thereby accommodating even the most
> > timid LO2E giveaway voter.
> >
> > As I said, RCV only works & has merit if the voters aren’t timid
> > overcomromising LO2E giveaway voters.
> What do you mean by "timid overcompromising LO2E giveaway voters" here
> -- the voters who are afraid the greater evil will win and thus
> compromise for the lesser evil, or the voters who insist on not
> compromising? I didn't quite get your meaning.
> -km
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20230923/8285a243/attachment.htm>

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list