[EM] Reply to Rob regarding RCV

Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_elmet at t-online.de
Sat Sep 23 12:26:22 PDT 2023

On 2023-09-23 20:19, Michael Ossipoff wrote:

> But I would like to remind you that I also continue to say that 
> Condorcet, in its best versions, is my favorite, because, always 
> electing the CW, it best gets rid of the lesser-of-2-evils problem 
> (LO2E) for any & everykind of voter, thereby accommodating even the most 
> timid LO2E giveaway voter.
> As I said, RCV only works & has merit if the voters aren’t timid 
> overcomromising LO2E giveaway voters.

What do you mean by "timid overcompromising LO2E giveaway voters" here 
-- the voters who are afraid the greater evil will win and thus 
compromise for the lesser evil, or the voters who insist on not 
compromising? I didn't quite get your meaning.


More information about the Election-Methods mailing list