[EM] [CES #16453] Re: GOOD voting: a brand to encompass 3-2-1, GOLD, etc.

[Ted Stern]

Any method that satisfies the Favorite Betrayal Criterion could be called
Favorite Voting.

That includes Approval, Majority Judgment, and several other methods that
have been proposed on the election-methods mailing list:

http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Favorite_Betrayal_criterion

3-2-1 voting also has a FBC aspect in that the 3 semifinalists are chosen
with an FBC compliant method.

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:45 PM, parker friedland <
parkerfriedland at gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually, scratch that.
>
> Approval Voting should be re branded as Favorite Voting (Because you don't
> ever have to be afraid to support your favorite candidate).
>
> Here are a list of all the different names we could consider calling
> Approval Voting:
> Favorite Voting
> Arrow Voting (paying respect to Kenneth Arrow)
> Modern Voting
> Upgraded Voting
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 11:30:10 PM UTC-7, parker friedland wrote:
>>
>> I have the perfect idea. If fair vote wants to play dirty, we can play
>> dirty!
>>
>> Let's re brand approval voting as modern voting (even though it is not
>> the only modern voting system)
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 12:08:20 PM UTC-7, Jameson Quinn wrote:
>>>
>>> FairVote has definitely decided to say "RCV" instead of "IRV" and/or
>>> "STV". I think it's a good idea to have a branding that encompasses both
>>> single-winner and multi-winner reform, but the "RCV" name is fingernails on
>>> a blackboard for me, because plenty of other systems involved ranked
>>> choices.
>>>
>>> So that got me thinking about making a name for the methods I'm most in
>>> favor of these days: 3-2-1, GOLD, and 3RD. All of these methods allow
>>> optional delegation, and have some kind of graded substrate. Thus, they're
>>> all GOOD methods: Graded Or Optionally Delegated. (Another method that
>>> would fit in this category is SODA.)
>>>
>>> Marketing for GOOD methods in general would probably focus on the
>>> choice. "Do you not trust politicians and parties? There's a GOOD way for
>>> you to vote, without delegation. Or alternately, are you highly engaged
>>> with politics, and excited to campaign for the best candidates, even if
>>> they may not always win? There's a GOOD way for you, too; you can find the
>>> best candidate and delegate to them, giving them extra exposure and
>>> bargaining power, whether or not they win."
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Center for Election Science" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to electionscience+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20170614/2911d7cb/attachment.htm>