[EM] hmmm. Maybe I missed something before SF passed IRV then called it RCV?
kbearman at isd.net
Sun Jul 2 07:42:55 PDT 2017
On 7/1/2017 8:50 PM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> not only is Condorcet simpler than IRV, that precinct-summability that
> Kathy mentioned is important. Condorcet allows for transmission of
> subtotals from precincts up to the central tabulation for the grand
> totals. IRV requires that a record of *every* ballot (and that
> ballot's specific ranking) be transmitted from the precinct up to the
> central tabulation.
= = = = =
[KB] If the central election office has only precinct subtotals but
doesn't have every ballot (and its rankings), how would it run a recount?
- Ken Bearman, Minneapolis MN
More information about the Election-Methods