[EM] Fwd: XA
Forest Simmons
fsimmons at pcc.edu
Fri Oct 28 15:32:02 PDT 2016
It looks like we'll have to settle for mono-add-plump.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Toby Pereira <tdp201b at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I think Chiastic Approval would fail participation, assuming I've done
> this right. Take the following ballots with scores out of 100:
>
> 2 voters: A=50, B=40
> 1 voter: A=50, B=60
>
> A would have a score of 50. B would have a score of 40.
>
Everyone gives B a score of at least 40, and only a third give B a score
> higher. Now imagine there are two extra voters and we have these ballots:
>
> 2 voters: A=50, B=40
> 1 voter: A=50, B=60
> 2 voters: A=100, B=60
>
> A still has a score of 50, but B now has a score of 60. So these two
> ballots cause B to overtake A despite them both preferring A to B.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Forest Simmons <fsimmons at pcc.edu>
>
>
> Does it satisfy Participation?
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20161028/7a19337b/attachment.htm>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list