[EM] MAM vs Schulze

[Michael Ossipoff]

(Replying farther down)

On Oct 5, 2016 9:44 PM, "Markus Schulze" <markus.schulze at alumni.tu-berlin.de>
wrote:
>
> Hallo,
>
>
> > I remind you that our topic is MAM vs Schulze. Therefore
> > the pairwise comparison most relevant here is the pairwise
> > comparison between MAM & Schulze.
>
> When the Schulze winner is identical to the MinMax winner,
> while the MAM winner differs from the MinMax winner, then
> this necessarily means that the worst pairwise defeat of
> the Schulze winner is weaker than the worst pairwise defeat
> of the MAM winner. That's why those findings are relevant
> when we compare MAM and Schulze.

As I said, you're referring to a defeat that's contradicted & overruled by
being weakest in a cycle with defeats that aren't overruled in that way.

Anyway, ask people whether they prefer the Schulze winner to the MAM
winner. Usually (4 to 1 or 5 to 1?) they'll say that they prefer the MAM
winner.

That's rather compelling.

Michael Ossipoff
>
>
> Markus Schulze
>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20161008/ff97cf77/attachment-0001.htm>