[EM] [CES #15276] Re: PAR: nearly-equivalent rules
C.Benham
cbenham at adam.com.au
Mon Nov 14 20:53:31 PST 2016
The proposed method has an easy Push-over incentive and fails FBC and
Condorcet.
Chris Benham
On 11/15/2016 10:43 AM, Jameson Quinn wrote:
> Nevin's proposed method is pretty good, but it suffers from a slippery
> slope problem in a chicken dilemma scenario.
>
> 2016-11-14 17:54 GMT-05:00 Nevin Brackett-Rozinsky
> <nevin.brackettrozinsky at gmail.com
> <mailto:nevin.brackettrozinsky at gmail.com>>:
>
> How about something like this:
>
> 1. Voters indicate whether they Prefer, Accept, or Reject each
> candidate.
> 2. Identify the candidate with the most Prefer votes, call them P.
> 3. Identify the candidate with the most Accept-or-better votes,
> call them Q.
> 4. Elect the head-to-head winner between P and Q.
>
> For step 4, this means to count the number of ballots which rate P
> ahead of Q, and vice versa, and elect whichever is higher up on
> more ballots.
>
> Essentially, this method looks at the ballots and says, “We know
> who the most voters prefer, and we know who the most voters
> accept, but which of them should win? Hey, I know, we can let the
> votes decide!”
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "The Center for Election Science" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to electionscience+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
> <mailto:electionscience+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2016.0.7859 / Virus Database: 4664/13405 - Release Date: 11/13/16
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20161115/f419d136/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list