<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">The proposed method has an easy
      Push-over incentive and fails FBC and Condorcet.<br>
      <br>
      Chris Benham<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 11/15/2016 10:43 AM, Jameson Quinn wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAO82iZxEt0j8WGVk6A8QKiGRzBMr3ZRkGZN2+FH+3rxw5=DY6A@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Nevin's proposed method is pretty good, but it
        suffers from a slippery slope problem in a chicken dilemma
        scenario. </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">2016-11-14 17:54 GMT-05:00 Nevin
          Brackett-Rozinsky <span dir="ltr"><<a
              moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:nevin.brackettrozinsky@gmail.com"
              target="_blank">nevin.brackettrozinsky@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">How about something like this:
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>1. Voters indicate whether they Prefer, Accept, or
                Reject each candidate.</div>
              <div>2. Identify the candidate with the most Prefer votes,
                call them P.</div>
              <div>3. Identify the candidate with the most
                Accept-or-better votes, call them Q.</div>
              <div>4. Elect the head-to-head winner between P and Q.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>For step 4, this means to count the number of ballots
                which rate P ahead of Q, and vice versa, and elect
                whichever is higher up on more ballots.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Essentially, this method looks at the ballots and
                says, “We know who the most voters prefer, and we know
                who the most voters accept, but which of them should
                win? Hey, I know, we can let the votes decide!”</div>
            </div>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5">
                -- <br>
                You received this message because you are subscribed to
                the Google Groups "The Center for Election Science"
                group.<br>
                To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
                from it, send an email to <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:electionscience+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com"
                  target="_blank">electionscience+unsubscribe@<wbr>googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
                For more options, visit <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://groups.google.com/d/optout"
                  target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/d/<wbr>optout</a>.<br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">----
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://electorama.com/em">http://electorama.com/em</a> for list info
</pre>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <p class="" avgcert""="" color="#000000" align="left">No virus
        found in this message.<br>
        Checked by AVG - <a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</a><br>
        Version: 2016.0.7859 / Virus Database: 4664/13405 - Release
        Date: 11/13/16</p>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>