[EM] FBC, center squeeze, and CD
Toby Pereira
tdp201b at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Nov 8 05:35:50 PST 2016
On this subject, wouldn't mono-add-plump be better described as participation-add-plump? It's more akin to a participation failure than a monotonicity failure.
Changing an existing ballot = monotonicityAdding a new ballot = participation
From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
To: C.Benham <cbenham at adam.com.au>; EM <election-methods at lists.electorama.com>
Sent: Monday, 7 November 2016, 21:32
Subject: Re: [EM] FBC, center squeeze, and CD
Chris--
You suggested that Mono-Add-Plump failure is worse than Mono-Raise failure because people care more about their favorites, and because Mono-Raise failure is simpler.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20161108/ec197b12/attachment.htm>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list