[EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism.
juho4880 at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Feb 9 16:31:13 PST 2012
On 10.2.2012, at 2.17, James Gilmour wrote:
>> Juho Laatu > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 8:07 PM
>> As I earlier wrote, I think the US has many options on how to
>> go forward with the reform. The presidential election is
>> maybe the most interesting one.
> This may be the most interesting election, but as it is almost certainly the most difficult in which to achieve any practical
> reform, it is perhaps best left to last.
Yes. But the reformists should have a good understanding on what kind of end state they aim at, and what the intermediate steps might look like.
> The vested interests in maintaining various aspects of the electoral college system are
> such that much more could be achieved by turning the single-winner focus on to other single-winner elections.
The reform could well make progress in a bottom-up way. I.e. start with individual towns and progress to other towns and then higher up if the new approach is good enough to raise interest and popularity. I agree that the presidential election is not an easy place to start a reform.
> And of course, along
> with that, I would recommend changing the voting systems for all the various "representative assemblies" to make them properly
> representative of those who vote.
Sounds like proportional representation.
> Once these are all in place, the presidential election will stick out like a sore thumb. Your
> chance of reform of the voting system for that election will be much greater then.
Right. This soulnds like a potential path for a suuccessful reform.
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
More information about the Election-Methods