[EM] Is there any profile where IRV is worse than Plurality?

Jameson Quinn jameson.quinn at gmail.com
Sat Sep 24 08:19:25 PDT 2011


Further note. Burlington probably would not have happened under plurality.
Of course, the same ballots would have given the same results - but
Duverger's Law would have probably made voters act differently, so that the
Democrat would have stayed in the race.

General point: you can't just compare systems under the same ballots; you
have to look at the probable strategies from the same electorate.

JQ

2011/9/24 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at lavabit.com>

> Andy Jennings wrote:
>
>> Very good example.  Thanks.
>>
>
> Also note that even if IRV dominated Plurality on results, IRV fails
> certain criteria that Plurality passes. IRV is not summable, but Plurality
> is. Hence IRV could lead to worse results in places where ballot tampering
> happen.
>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20110924/8c0aa539/attachment-0004.htm>


More information about the Election-Methods mailing list