[EM] Last call for edits to consensus statement

[Andy Jennings]

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jameson Quinn <jameson.quinn at gmail.com>wrote:

> For instance, for range voting, the equipment could count how many people
> gave each rating to candidate A, from a simple array of choices such as 0,
> 1, 50, 98, 99, or 100. Most choices are bunched near the ends of the scale,
> as this helps range voters get near to the maximum power from their ballot.
>

I'm glad these sentences have been removed.  I think this point is way too
confusing for the intended audience.

~ Andy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20110912/37953201/attachment-0004.htm>