[EM] Has this idea been considered?

[Andy Jennings]

I agree with Kevin that the existing SODA page on the wiki is _not_ for
novices.

I created a simplified page:
http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Simple_Optionally-Delegated_Approval_(simplified)

Feel free to edit, but let's add to it as little as possible, or even take
some away if we can.

Andy



On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Venzke <stepjak at yahoo.fr> wrote:

> --- En date de : Ven 8.7.11, Toby Pereira <tdp201b at yahoo.co.uk> a écrit :
> The thing about SODA is that it's harder to "get" than Approval Voting.
> I haven't exactly read through all the posts on it here thoroughly but
> I've looked at the page - http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/
> Simple_Optionally-Delegated_Approval - and I do find myself
> thinking "What?"
> [end quote]
>
>
> Well hmm. I'm kind of looking at this article as a collection of things
> that have been said by SODA people. As a neutral intro to the method
> for people who don't know whether the inventors have any idea what they
> are talking about, it's kind of terrible.
>
> In particular that intro paragraph... I didn't want to go on.
>
> "I'm going to abandon the neutral voice and talk as myself."
>
> Ahaha.
>
> Maybe the article should be forked. Have one concise, neutral version
> (like neutral neutral), and then the exciting one.
>
> Kevin
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20110712/c47f580e/attachment-0004.htm>