[EM] Median-based Proportional Representation
Jameson Quinn
jameson.quinn at gmail.com
Sat Jul 9 09:11:01 PDT 2011
2011/7/8 Warren Smith <warren.wds at gmail.com>
> Sorry, as Jameson pointed out, he has invented a voting method he calls
> AT-TV
> which (he claims)
> 1. obeys a proportional representation theorem
Yes. It's instructive to see what PR criterion AT-TV satisfies, and what RRV
satisfies.
The standard Droop criterion, if I'm not mistaken, is: If a group of N droop
quotas of voters votes a set of >N candidates above all other candidates,
then at least N candidates from that set must win.
The AT-TV version would be: If a group of N droop quotas of voters votes a
set of >N candidates at or above a given rating, and all other candidates
below that rating, then at least N candidates from that set will win.
The RRV version... well, I'm not sure, but my guess is that it would be
something like: If a group of N droop quotas of voters votes a set of >N
candidates each with at least N times the rating of any candidate outside
that set, then at least N candidates from that set must win.
Note that these are successively weaker criteria on the systems; that is,
the coordination of a given party must be successively stronger to ensure PR
for that party. Purely on a subjective level, I think that AT-TV criterion
is about right, and that the RRV one is too weak.
JQ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20110709/32b7bf09/attachment-0004.htm>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list