[EM] Burlington Vermont repeals IRV 52% to 48%
lists001 at robertjrichard.com
Wed Mar 3 11:53:31 PST 2010
Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
> What method will be used in Burlington now -- Plurality or runoff?
> Since you said 40% earlier, I guess it's a runoff, but 40% sounds odd
> as a runoff threshold. Shouldn't it be majority? Anything less and the
> voters might have preferred someone else.
The argument for 40% as opposed to 50% comes from political scientists
and is practical rather than conceptual. Essentially it is that a
plurality winner who gets 40% is extremely unlikely to lose a runoff
against the second-place candidate, so that the runoff isn't worth the
additional expense (to the candidates and voters as well as the
government). A refinement on this is the "double complement rule",
I'm not supporting either the double complement rule or the 40%
threshold. I'm just reporting what I know about the rationale.
Executive Vice President
Californians for Electoral Reform
PO Box 235
Kentfield, CA 94914-0235
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Election-Methods