[Election-Methods] [english 95%] Re: [english 95%] Re: [english 94%] Re: method designchallenge+new method AMP

[raphfrk at netscape.net]

 Jobst wrote:
> 
Do you think one could modify the "Anti-STV" approach in a different way 
to overcome the cloning problem without making the method majoritarian? 


 
It is hard to see how to force a majority to give information about lower preferences without having some form of candidate control.

However, if you give the candidate control to the voters, then the majority can put up a majority of the candidates.





Raphfrk
--------------------
Interesting site
"what if anyone could modify the laws"

www.wikocracy.com

 




________________________________________________________________________
AOL's new homepage has launched. Take a tour at http://info.aol.co.uk/homepage/ now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20080504/3d2ecc59/attachment-0003.htm>