[Election-Methods] Partisan Politics
Fred Gohlke
fredgohlke at verizon.net
Mon Apr 7 13:43:33 PDT 2008
Good Afternoon, Juho
Curses!! When I returned Friday, ready to resume our discussion, I
found a communications failure. A report to my "service-oriented"
telephone company elicited a promise to repair the problem before 8 p.m.
Monday. I didn't think they'd take nearly every minute of that to
finish the job. Ohhh, the blessings of science ... no telephone ... no
internet! If we ever have a hurricane, I'll be incommunicado for a month.
Ah, well, the kids came for a visit and that's better, anyway.
re: "But trying to find better solutions (not just push one's own
solutions that one might consider to be the best) ..."
A cogent assertion. It will happen naturally when one's solution is
rationally shown to be unsound.
re: "The decisions that politicians make do involve large sums of money,
and there are nice job opportunities and also publicity etc. In these
circumstances it may be difficult to get through the buzzing crowd and
meet the original intention of politics, to improve the system."
But, as you said, "... this is how the system typically works". When
such circumstances are deeply woven into the fabric of our political
existence, they tend to be seen as 'inevitable', That dissuades many
from believing it possible to correct them. In addition, the symptoms
of corruption become so common we waste ourselves battling the symptoms
instead of curing the disease.
re: "In politics the dependences to various directions may easily get
too strong."
And THAT'S a fact ... but knowing it is not enough ... the question is
how do we use the knowledge? We know these things work to our detriment
and we lament them vigorously. We would do better to weaken the bonds
that make them possible.
It occurs to me you may think me one of those who pushes their own
solution. It's a valid perception. I live in a once-great nation
suffering the evils of an incestuous political system that long-since
lost touch with the people.
Yet, when I look among my peers, I don't find people carefully analyzing
the causes of our system's breakdown. I find proposals for electoral
methods like "delegable proxy" which will see votes sold on eBay before
the ink is dry on the enabling legislation.
The only proposal I've heard that would improve our political system is
mandatory single-term limits for all elective offices. That will not
eliminate the corruption inherent in partisan politics, but it will
prevent the long-term rot that currently pervades our political
infrastructure.
Every impropriety in our system is traceable to acts of our
legislatures, enacted by individuals whose obligations are to their
party rather than to the people who elected them. That is the origin of
our political plight. Clearly, the method by which our legislators are
chosen is deficient. Studying the deficiency shows that allowing
external entities to insinuate themselves between the people and their
legislators is wrong. As we've seen in my country, it's more than
wrong, it's devastating.
You feel my estimate of 200 years to make a significant change in our
political system is pessimistic. Perhaps, but so far it looks like it
will take 199 of those years for the people to recognize the kudzu-like
effects of partisan politics. By then, perhaps we'll have gained the
wit to design an alternative that selects the best of our people and
raises them to positions of leadership in our government.
Fred
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list