[Election-Methods] Partisan Politics
Juho
juho4880 at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Apr 1 11:32:19 PDT 2008
On Mar 31, 2008, at 20:33 , Fred Gohlke wrote:
> re: "... one needs to adapt to a situation where the main decisions
> and
> most powerful streams and even highest respect in the society will
> occur
> at a suboptimal level."
>
> I agree we must adapt to such a situation, for we have little choice,
> but I don't think we should accept it. The essence of progress is
> considering possibilities and alternatives, often to things thought
> immutable.
Ok, I didn't really mean "accept" in the sense of giving up any hope
of change. I used "accept" in the meaning that while trying to
improve the system we should take into account that this is how the
system typically works.
> In the final analysis, I think those of us who feel compelled to
> "find a
> better way" must do our utmost to be reasonable, seek the guidance of
> those with expertise, and carefully consider the thoughtful
> opinions of
> others.
Yes, makes sense. That is not always the most painless path. But
trying to find better solutions (not just push one's own solutions
that one might consider to be the best) and thereby improve the world
that we live in is a good and essential feature in us humans.
> One thing I learned was that it is well-nigh
> impossible to defeat the persistent access professional lobbyists have
> to our elected representatives, an access that fosters subornation.
Yes. I think where there is honey there are also flies and wasps
flying around. The decisions that politicians make do involve large
sums of money, and there are nice job opportunities and also
publicity etc. In these circumstances it may be difficult to get
through the buzzing crowd and meet the original intention of
politics, to improve the system.
> It seems to me our elected representatives are in service, just like
> members of the armed services. Like members of our armed forces, I
> think elected officials should be kept at a government installation
> and
> access to them should be restricted.
I think Montesquieu was right when proposing the separation of
powers. I'd actually take few steps forward and add few more
separations in the list. In politics the dependences to various
directions may easily get too strong. (Money is often involved, as in
the discussion on how to make the financial situation of the
representatives safe enough, in political campaigning etc.)
Juho
___________________________________________________________
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list