[EM] Siimpson-Kramer definition
Curt Siffert
siffert at museworld.com
Thu Apr 14 00:41:16 PDT 2005
Speaking as someone more from the public than from this list, I'd
translate it as:
Take each candidate and put them in a head-to-head matchup with every
other candidate. For each candidate, find the head-to-head matchup
where the candidate has the most votes against them (even if they win
that matchup). Record that number.
Do that for every candidate. The candidate that has the smallest
number is the winner.
Seems like a pretty weird method to me. And it doesn't seem like it
would always select a Condorcet Winner if it exists.
Curt
On Apr 13, 2005, at 8:16 PM, Paul Kislanko wrote:
> "The winner is the candidate whose greatest vote against him/her in a
> pairwise comparison (defeat or victory) is the least."
>
> If there's anything that's going to keep an improvement in election
> methods
> from being accepted by the people who have to vote for a change it is
> language like this.
>
> I had to read that sentence three times and vote on which of the three
> interpretations was most likely the correct one.
>
> I am not at all sure that any of my interpretations are what the author
> meant.
>
>
> ----
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list
> info
>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list