[EM] OK, I'll try again, regarding the MAM example

[Paul Kislanko]

It's not me saying something's perfect, it's proponents of MAM who haven't
answered the question "why should I support it"? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: election-methods-electorama.com-bounces at electorama.com 
> [mailto:election-methods-electorama.com-bounces at electorama.com
> ] On Behalf Of Eric Gorr
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 4:20 PM
> To: election-methods at electorama.com
> Subject: Re: [EM] OK, I'll try again, regarding the MAM example
> 
> At 4:12 PM -0500 10/6/04, Paul Kislanko wrote:
> >Give me one good reason why I should support an election 
> method where 
> >the voters who rank candidate A last among 3 candidates 
> cause A to win 
> >the election.
> 
> Give me a perfect election method.
> 
> You can't.
> 
> Of the various election methods I am aware of, MAM is at the 
> top of my list.
> 
> It doesn't matter what election method you choose, it will 
> always have some flaw that at least one person will find 
> absolutely unacceptable.
> 
> If this is the case with you and what you believe to be a 
> flaw (mentioned above), then please say so.
> ----
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em 
> for list info
>