[EM] Approval Strategy A- Question for Rob LeGrand
gervase at group.force9.co.uk
Sun Nov 23 14:42:01 PST 2003
> From: "James Gilmour" <jgilmour at globalnet.co.uk>
> Subject: RE: [EM] Approval Strategy A- Question for Rob LeGrand
> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:34:05 -0000
> I am surprised that Borda should receive any serious consideration at
> all. The defects of this voting system are well known, so why would
> anyone want to use it?
No. I don't think it is a good idea to use it.
All I was doing was putting Borda in a hierarchy structure that showed how
"similar" one method was to another. What I basically implied in the post
was that Borda is as "close" as you can get to Cardinal Ratings without
actually being Cardinal Ratings.
> How has "proportional" being interpreted here?
I suppose this question in a way sums up what my post was saying/asking.
For each method, how is proportional being interpreted?
More information about the Election-Methods