[EM] Who did you say won?
ericgorr at cox.net
Mon Feb 24 10:46:54 PST 2003
>Eric Gorr wrote:
>>At 6:21 AM +0000 2/24/03, MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
>>>Is that what the mass media said?
>>I am not aware of any independent study which claims that Gore
>>would have won regardless of what the Supreme Court did.
>Here's an article telling how the same study that showed that "The
>Supreme Court's intervention probably did not affect the outcome of
>the limited recounts then under way", also showed that "more people
>probably cast valid votes for Gore than for Bush". It goes on to
>say why you didn't hear about that latter part.
"Probably?" 'Probably' isn't good enough and demonstrates absolutely nothing.
For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc),
please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
More information about the Election-Methods