Circular Stand-Off
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
Sat May 29 00:09:55 PDT 1999
If the net wins are put in the example in the May 27, 1999 posting, there is
Net Wins
> > > A:B=48:52 4B
> > > A:C=53:47 6A
> > > A:D=43:57 14D
> > > A:E=44:56 12E
> > > B:C=45:55 10C
> > > B:D=42:58 16D
> > > B:E=62:38 24B
> > > C:D=54:46 8C
> > > C:E=41:59 18E
> > > D:E=40:60 20E
Putting the net wins and losses in a head to head matrix produces
A B C D E Total Net Wins
A X -4 6 -14* -12 -24 Least
B 4 X -10 -16* 24 2
C -6 10 X 8 -18* -6
D 14 16 -8 X -20* 2
E 12 -24* 18 20 X 26 Most
Tot 24 -2 6 -2 -26 0
* = Worst Defeats in rows
I would suggest that choice E (and perhaps the voters) might be a little
unhappy if choice A wins due to Condorcet[EM] (smallest votes loss in worst
defeat).
I note again the sports analogy -
Wins Losses Net Wins [Wins behind E]
A 38 62 -24 25
B 51 49 2 12
C 47 53 -6 16
D 51 49 2 12
E 63 37 26 --
250 250 0
Thus, the question is what part, if any, of the above head to head matrix
should be looked at ???
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list